Tamed Cynic

Tamed Cynic

Share this post

Tamed Cynic
Tamed Cynic
The Temptation was for the Tempter

The Temptation was for the Tempter

In the wilderness, Satan failed to reveal God’s gracious love to be a lie.

Jason Micheli's avatar
Jason Micheli
Mar 03, 2025
∙ Paid
7

Share this post

Tamed Cynic
Tamed Cynic
The Temptation was for the Tempter
1
2
Share

If you appreciate the work, pay it forward. Literally! Become a paid subscriber.

Once the Lord crushes the satan underfoot will Lucifer remain?

Lent begins this Sunday with Luke’s account of Christ’s trial in the wilderness.

The contemporary western church tends, in the case of the mainline, to psychologize the biblical character of Satan into oblivion. Evangelicals meanwhile appear to harbor such crippling anxiety about the specter of heresy they avoid entertaining the questions the church fathers felt freed by the gospel to ask. Among these questions, the question of the ultimate fate of Satan and the fallen spirits. The closure of the question, however, shuts down hopeful possibilities for reading the scriptures.

Positing the ultimate salvation even of Satan and his minions, the 20th century Orthodox theologian Sergei Bulgakov reads the Gospels’s account of Christ’s temptation in the wilderness in light of the love of the Triune God. The temptations, Bulgakov ventures, were for tempter, who no longer believed the LORD is this faithful Son, his merciful Father, together in their Spirit.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Tamed Cynic to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jason Micheli
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share